weno ener ea ERT OP THE NAVY
BOAR FOR CUORREUTUN Ub NAVAL REUURLD
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR4448-14
13 Nov 14
qua
This igs in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
12 November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Letter 5420 Ser
N1/0884 dtd 25 August 2014, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence gubmitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel wili be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decigion. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
bocket No. NR4448-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
TAY
LY, C
Sf f Stas ¥
POM OEE
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: CNRFC Ltr 5420 Ser N1/0884 dtd 25 Aug 14
va
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11287 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0194 dated 4 March 2015 and CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0562 dated 16 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR11287-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08830 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0583 dtd 22 May 13 and CNRFC Email dtd 25 Jul 13, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00121-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Ltr 5420 Ser N1/918 dated 30 July 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00635-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Ltr 5420 Ser N1/957 dated 3 August 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5148 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC ltr 5420 Ser | N1/1263 dtd 22 Dec.14, a copy of which is attached. NR5148-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2891-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0846 dtd 24 Jul 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1885 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/c537 of 14 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 15 0 existence of probable materia Enclosure: Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3789 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014.. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Letter 5420 Ser N1/1161 — a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7180 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Letter 5420 Ser N1/1263 dated a a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0941-13
A three-member pane] of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with - all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is ‘on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...